vs
AGG vs BND: Performance & Backtest Comparison
AGG delivered the higher return - 3.17% CAGR vs 2.99% - over 2007-05-31 → 2026-06-30.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| AGG | BND | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF |
| CAGR | 3.17% | 2.99% |
| Total return | 81.82% | 75.99% |
| Volatility | 4.62% | 4.54% |
| Max drawdown | -17.14%Oct 2022 | -17.28%Oct 2022 |
| Sharpe | 0.39 | 0.35 |
| Sortino | 0.55 | 0.50 |
| Best year | 8.80% | 8.84% |
| Worst year | -13.02% | -13.11% |
| Final balance | $18,182 | $17,599 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.98. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, AGG or BND?
Over 2007-05-31 to 2026-06-30, AGG performed better: 3.17% annualized versus 2.99% for BND, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are AGG and BND?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.98 over the common period. AGG is iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF; BND is Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF.
Which is riskier, AGG or BND?
Over the common period AGG had 4.62% annualized volatility and a -17.14% max drawdown, versus 4.54% and -17.28% for BND.