vs
AGG vs BND: Performance & Backtest Comparison
BND delivered the higher return - 2.62% CAGR vs 1.81% - over 2007-05-31 → 2026-07-31.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| AGG | BND | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF |
| CAGR | 1.81% | 2.62% |
| Total return | 41.17% | 64.62% |
| Volatility | 4.61% | 4.57% |
| Max drawdown | -20.55%Oct 2023 | -20.63%Oct 2023 |
| Sharpe | 0.10 | 0.27 |
| Sortino | 0.14 | 0.37 |
| Best year | 8.45% | 8.83% |
| Worst year | -14.64% | -14.69% |
| Final balance | $14,117 | $16,462 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.98. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, AGG or BND?
Over 2007-05-31 to 2026-07-31, BND performed better: 2.62% annualized versus 1.81% for AGG, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are AGG and BND?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.98 over the common period. AGG is iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF; BND is Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF.
Which is riskier, AGG or BND?
Over the common period AGG had 4.61% annualized volatility and a -20.55% max drawdown, versus 4.57% and -20.63% for BND.