vs
AGG vs BNDX: Performance & Backtest Comparison
BNDX delivered the higher return - 2.15% CAGR vs 1.59% - over 2013-07-31 → 2026-07-31.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| AGG | BNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | Vanguard Total International Bond ETF |
| CAGR | 1.59% | 2.15% |
| Total return | 22.85% | 32.09% |
| Volatility | 4.72% | 4.06% |
| Max drawdown | -20.55%Oct 2023 | -15.85%Dec 2022 |
| Sharpe | -0.02 | 0.11 |
| Sortino | -0.02 | 0.14 |
| Best year | 8.45% | 8.74% |
| Worst year | -14.64% | -13.47% |
| Final balance | $12,285 | $13,209 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.86. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, AGG or BNDX?
Over 2013-07-31 to 2026-07-31, BNDX performed better: 2.15% annualized versus 1.59% for AGG, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are AGG and BNDX?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.86 over the common period. AGG is iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF; BNDX is Vanguard Total International Bond ETF.
Which is riskier, AGG or BNDX?
Over the common period AGG had 4.72% annualized volatility and a -20.55% max drawdown, versus 4.06% and -15.85% for BNDX.