vs
AGG vs BNDX: Performance & Backtest Comparison
BNDX delivered the higher return - 2.55% CAGR vs 2.10% - over 2013-07-31 → 2026-06-30.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| AGG | BNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | Vanguard Total International Bond ETF |
| CAGR | 2.10% | 2.55% |
| Total return | 31.03% | 38.74% |
| Volatility | 4.69% | 4.05% |
| Max drawdown | -17.14%Oct 2022 | -14.88%Sep 2022 |
| Sharpe | 0.09 | 0.20 |
| Sortino | 0.12 | 0.27 |
| Best year | 8.46% | 8.77% |
| Worst year | -13.02% | -12.76% |
| Final balance | $13,103 | $13,874 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.86. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, AGG or BNDX?
Over 2013-07-31 to 2026-06-30, BNDX performed better: 2.55% annualized versus 2.10% for AGG, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are AGG and BNDX?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.86 over the common period. AGG is iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF; BNDX is Vanguard Total International Bond ETF.
Which is riskier, AGG or BNDX?
Over the common period AGG had 4.69% annualized volatility and a -17.14% max drawdown, versus 4.05% and -14.88% for BNDX.