vs
BND vs VGIT: Performance & Backtest Comparison
VGIT delivered the higher return - 2.01% CAGR vs 1.97% - over 2009-12-31 → 2026-07-31.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| BND | VGIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF |
| CAGR | 1.97% | 2.01% |
| Total return | 38.53% | 39.30% |
| Volatility | 4.46% | 4.25% |
| Max drawdown | -20.63%Oct 2023 | -16.20%Oct 2023 |
| Sharpe | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| Sortino | 0.19 | 0.23 |
| Best year | 8.83% | 9.62% |
| Worst year | -14.69% | -11.12% |
| Final balance | $13,853 | $13,930 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.89. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, BND or VGIT?
Over 2009-12-31 to 2026-07-31, VGIT performed better: 2.01% annualized versus 1.97% for BND, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are BND and VGIT?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.89 over the common period. BND is Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF; VGIT is Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF.
Which is riskier, BND or VGIT?
Over the common period BND had 4.46% annualized volatility and a -20.63% max drawdown, versus 4.25% and -16.20% for VGIT.