vs
BND vs VGIT: Performance & Backtest Comparison
BND delivered the higher return - 2.40% CAGR vs 2.14% - over 2009-12-31 → 2026-06-30.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| BND | VGIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF |
| CAGR | 2.40% | 2.14% |
| Total return | 48.09% | 42.01% |
| Volatility | 4.43% | 4.24% |
| Max drawdown | -17.28%Oct 2022 | -14.96%Oct 2022 |
| Sharpe | 0.24 | 0.19 |
| Sortino | 0.32 | 0.28 |
| Best year | 8.84% | 9.62% |
| Worst year | -13.11% | -10.53% |
| Final balance | $14,809 | $14,201 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.89. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, BND or VGIT?
Over 2009-12-31 to 2026-06-30, BND performed better: 2.40% annualized versus 2.14% for VGIT, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are BND and VGIT?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.89 over the common period. BND is Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF; VGIT is Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF.
Which is riskier, BND or VGIT?
Over the common period BND had 4.43% annualized volatility and a -17.28% max drawdown, versus 4.24% and -14.96% for VGIT.