vs
BND vs VGLT: Performance & Backtest Comparison
VGLT delivered the higher return - 2.49% CAGR vs 2.01% - over 2010-02-28 → 2026-07-31.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| BND | VGLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF |
| CAGR | 2.01% | 2.49% |
| Total return | 38.78% | 50.01% |
| Volatility | 4.45% | 12.37% |
| Max drawdown | -20.63%Oct 2023 | -46.61%Oct 2023 |
| Sharpe | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Sortino | 0.19 | 0.26 |
| Best year | 8.83% | 29.16% |
| Worst year | -14.69% | -29.85% |
| Final balance | $13,878 | $15,001 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.85. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, BND or VGLT?
Over 2010-02-28 to 2026-07-31, VGLT performed better: 2.49% annualized versus 2.01% for BND, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are BND and VGLT?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.85 over the common period. BND is Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF; VGLT is Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF.
Which is riskier, BND or VGLT?
Over the common period BND had 4.45% annualized volatility and a -20.63% max drawdown, versus 12.37% and -46.61% for VGLT.