vs
EFA vs VWO: Performance & Backtest Comparison
VWO delivered the higher return - 7.26% CAGR vs 6.39% - over 2005-04-30 → 2026-06-30.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| EFA | VWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF |
| CAGR | 6.39% | 7.26% |
| Total return | 272.74% | 343.38% |
| Volatility | 16.83% | 20.21% |
| Max drawdown | -56.91%Feb 2009 | -61.69%Feb 2009 |
| Sharpe | 0.35 | 0.37 |
| Sortino | 0.49 | 0.51 |
| Best year | 31.55% | 76.31% |
| Worst year | -40.69% | -52.46% |
| Final balance | $37,274 | $44,338 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.85. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, EFA or VWO?
Over 2005-04-30 to 2026-06-30, VWO performed better: 7.26% annualized versus 6.39% for EFA, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are EFA and VWO?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.85 over the common period. EFA is iShares MSCI EAFE ETF; VWO is Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF.
Which is riskier, EFA or VWO?
Over the common period EFA had 16.83% annualized volatility and a -56.91% max drawdown, versus 20.21% and -61.69% for VWO.