vs
IWF vs QQQ: Performance & Backtest Comparison
QQQ delivered the higher return - 9.43% CAGR vs 8.26% - over 2000-06-30 → 2026-06-30.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| IWF | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | iShares Russell 1000 Growth Fund | Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 |
| CAGR | 8.26% | 9.43% |
| Total return | 692.63% | 950.29% |
| Volatility | 17.45% | 22.51% |
| Max drawdown | -61.92%Sep 2002 | -79.61%Sep 2002 |
| Sharpe | 0.44 | 0.43 |
| Sortino | 0.60 | 0.57 |
| Best year | 42.59% | 54.86% |
| Worst year | -38.22% | -41.73% |
| Final balance | $79,263 | $105,029 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.95. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, IWF or QQQ?
Over 2000-06-30 to 2026-06-30, QQQ performed better: 9.43% annualized versus 8.26% for IWF, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are IWF and QQQ?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.95 over the common period. IWF is iShares Russell 1000 Growth Fund; QQQ is Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1.
Which is riskier, IWF or QQQ?
Over the common period IWF had 17.45% annualized volatility and a -61.92% max drawdown, versus 22.51% and -79.61% for QQQ.