vs
IWF vs QQQ: Performance & Backtest Comparison
QQQ delivered the higher return - 9.08% CAGR vs 7.93% - over 2000-06-30 → 2026-07-31.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| IWF | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | iShares Russell 1000 Growth Fund | Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 |
| CAGR | 7.93% | 9.08% |
| Total return | 636.60% | 871.33% |
| Volatility | 17.49% | 22.51% |
| Max drawdown | -61.92%Sep 2002 | -79.61%Sep 2002 |
| Sharpe | 0.42 | 0.42 |
| Sortino | 0.58 | 0.56 |
| Best year | 42.60% | 54.85% |
| Worst year | -38.22% | -41.73% |
| Final balance | $73,660 | $97,133 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.95. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, IWF or QQQ?
Over 2000-06-30 to 2026-07-31, QQQ performed better: 9.08% annualized versus 7.93% for IWF, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are IWF and QQQ?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.95 over the common period. IWF is iShares Russell 1000 Growth Fund; QQQ is Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1.
Which is riskier, IWF or QQQ?
Over the common period IWF had 17.49% annualized volatility and a -61.92% max drawdown, versus 22.51% and -79.61% for QQQ.