vs
IWF vs VGT: Performance & Backtest Comparison
VGT delivered the higher return - 15.14% CAGR vs 12.22% - over 2004-02-29 → 2026-06-30.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| IWF | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | iShares Russell 1000 Growth Fund | Vanguard Information Tech ETF |
| CAGR | 12.22% | 15.14% |
| Total return | 1226.81% | 2258.19% |
| Volatility | 16.05% | 19.52% |
| Max drawdown | -48.00%Feb 2009 | -50.60%Feb 2009 |
| Sharpe | 0.70 | 0.74 |
| Sortino | 1.00 | 1.17 |
| Best year | 42.59% | 61.89% |
| Worst year | -38.22% | -42.82% |
| Final balance | $132,681 | $235,819 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.95. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, IWF or VGT?
Over 2004-02-29 to 2026-06-30, VGT performed better: 15.14% annualized versus 12.22% for IWF, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are IWF and VGT?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.95 over the common period. IWF is iShares Russell 1000 Growth Fund; VGT is Vanguard Information Tech ETF.
Which is riskier, IWF or VGT?
Over the common period IWF had 16.05% annualized volatility and a -48.00% max drawdown, versus 19.52% and -50.60% for VGT.