vs
IWF vs VGT: Performance & Backtest Comparison
VGT delivered the higher return - 14.61% CAGR vs 11.81% - over 2004-02-29 → 2026-07-31.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| IWF | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | iShares Russell 1000 Growth Fund | Vanguard Information Tech ETF |
| CAGR | 11.81% | 14.61% |
| Total return | 1133.03% | 2052.22% |
| Volatility | 16.11% | 19.57% |
| Max drawdown | -48.00%Feb 2009 | -50.60%Feb 2009 |
| Sharpe | 0.67 | 0.71 |
| Sortino | 0.96 | 1.14 |
| Best year | 42.60% | 61.89% |
| Worst year | -38.22% | -42.82% |
| Final balance | $123,303 | $215,222 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.95. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, IWF or VGT?
Over 2004-02-29 to 2026-07-31, VGT performed better: 14.61% annualized versus 11.81% for IWF, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are IWF and VGT?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.95 over the common period. IWF is iShares Russell 1000 Growth Fund; VGT is Vanguard Information Tech ETF.
Which is riskier, IWF or VGT?
Over the common period IWF had 16.11% annualized volatility and a -48.00% max drawdown, versus 19.57% and -50.60% for VGT.