vs
IWF vs VUG: Performance & Backtest Comparison
IWF delivered the higher return - 12.22% CAGR vs 12.18% - over 2004-02-29 → 2026-06-30.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| IWF | VUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | iShares Russell 1000 Growth Fund | Vanguard Growth ETF |
| CAGR | 12.22% | 12.18% |
| Total return | 1226.81% | 1215.33% |
| Volatility | 16.05% | 16.55% |
| Max drawdown | -48.00%Feb 2009 | -47.18%Feb 2009 |
| Sharpe | 0.70 | 0.68 |
| Sortino | 1.00 | 0.98 |
| Best year | 42.59% | 46.83% |
| Worst year | -38.22% | -38.02% |
| Final balance | $132,681 | $131,533 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 1.00. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, IWF or VUG?
Over 2004-02-29 to 2026-06-30, IWF performed better: 12.22% annualized versus 12.18% for VUG, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are IWF and VUG?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 1.00 over the common period. IWF is iShares Russell 1000 Growth Fund; VUG is Vanguard Growth ETF.
Which is riskier, IWF or VUG?
Over the common period IWF had 16.05% annualized volatility and a -48.00% max drawdown, versus 16.55% and -47.18% for VUG.