BacktestPortfolios.com
Backtest any portfolio free - stocks, ETFs, crypto & gold, history back to 1871.
vs

IWM vs VIOO: Performance & Backtest Comparison

VIOO delivered the higher return - 12.23% CAGR vs 11.45% - over 2010-10-31 → 2026-06-30.

Growth comparison

Drawdown

Annual returns

IWMVIOO
NameiShares Russell 2000 Index FundVanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
CAGR11.45%12.23%
Total return451.36%515.50%
Volatility19.21%18.98%
Max drawdown-32.29%Mar 2020-36.10%Mar 2020
Sharpe0.590.63
Sortino0.870.96
Best year38.69%41.28%
Worst year-20.48%-16.27%
Final balance$55,136$61,550

Correlation of monthly returns: 0.98. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →

All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.

Which has performed better, IWM or VIOO?

Over 2010-10-31 to 2026-06-30, VIOO performed better: 12.23% annualized versus 11.45% for IWM, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

How similar are IWM and VIOO?

Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.98 over the common period. IWM is iShares Russell 2000 Index Fund; VIOO is Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF.

Which is riskier, IWM or VIOO?

Over the common period IWM had 19.21% annualized volatility and a -32.29% max drawdown, versus 18.98% and -36.10% for VIOO.