vs
NOBL vs VYM: Performance & Backtest Comparison
VYM delivered the higher return - 11.23% CAGR vs 10.11% - over 2013-11-30 → 2026-07-31.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| NOBL | VYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF |
| CAGR | 10.11% | 11.23% |
| Total return | 241.54% | 288.26% |
| Volatility | 14.04% | 13.36% |
| Max drawdown | -23.23%Mar 2020 | -23.98%Mar 2020 |
| Sharpe | 0.63 | 0.73 |
| Sortino | 0.93 | 1.04 |
| Best year | 26.94% | 26.21% |
| Worst year | -6.51% | -5.91% |
| Final balance | $34,154 | $38,826 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.94. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, NOBL or VYM?
Over 2013-11-30 to 2026-07-31, VYM performed better: 11.23% annualized versus 10.11% for NOBL, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are NOBL and VYM?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.94 over the common period. NOBL is ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF; VYM is Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF.
Which is riskier, NOBL or VYM?
Over the common period NOBL had 14.04% annualized volatility and a -23.23% max drawdown, versus 13.36% and -23.98% for VYM.