vs
SCHA vs VB: Performance & Backtest Comparison
VB delivered the higher return - 12.42% CAGR vs 12.25% - over 2009-12-31 → 2026-07-31.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| SCHA | VB | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard Small-Cap ETF |
| CAGR | 12.25% | 12.42% |
| Total return | 585.94% | 603.37% |
| Volatility | 19.20% | 18.29% |
| Max drawdown | -32.27%Mar 2020 | -30.07%Mar 2020 |
| Sharpe | 0.63 | 0.66 |
| Sortino | 0.93 | 0.95 |
| Best year | 39.51% | 37.70% |
| Worst year | -19.80% | -17.50% |
| Final balance | $68,594 | $70,337 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.99. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, SCHA or VB?
Over 2009-12-31 to 2026-07-31, VB performed better: 12.42% annualized versus 12.25% for SCHA, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are SCHA and VB?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.99 over the common period. SCHA is Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF; VB is Vanguard Small-Cap ETF.
Which is riskier, SCHA or VB?
Over the common period SCHA had 19.20% annualized volatility and a -32.27% max drawdown, versus 18.29% and -30.07% for VB.