vs
SCHA vs VB: Performance & Backtest Comparison
SCHA delivered the higher return - 13.02% CAGR vs 12.68% - over 2009-12-31 → 2026-06-30.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| SCHA | VB | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard Small-Cap ETF |
| CAGR | 13.02% | 12.68% |
| Total return | 661.52% | 624.05% |
| Volatility | 19.19% | 18.33% |
| Max drawdown | -31.57%Mar 2020 | -30.07%Mar 2020 |
| Sharpe | 0.66 | 0.67 |
| Sortino | 0.98 | 0.97 |
| Best year | 39.51% | 37.70% |
| Worst year | -19.24% | -17.54% |
| Final balance | $76,152 | $72,405 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.99. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, SCHA or VB?
Over 2009-12-31 to 2026-06-30, SCHA performed better: 13.02% annualized versus 12.68% for VB, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are SCHA and VB?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.99 over the common period. SCHA is Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF; VB is Vanguard Small-Cap ETF.
Which is riskier, SCHA or VB?
Over the common period SCHA had 19.19% annualized volatility and a -31.57% max drawdown, versus 18.33% and -30.07% for VB.