vs
SCHV vs VTV: Performance & Backtest Comparison
VTV delivered the higher return - 12.44% CAGR vs 12.01% - over 2010-01-31 → 2026-06-30.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| SCHV | VTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | Vanguard Value ETF |
| CAGR | 12.01% | 12.44% |
| Total return | 549.29% | 592.17% |
| Volatility | 14.11% | 13.95% |
| Max drawdown | -25.64%Mar 2020 | -25.07%Mar 2020 |
| Sharpe | 0.78 | 0.81 |
| Sortino | 1.11 | 1.18 |
| Best year | 31.03% | 33.10% |
| Worst year | -7.63% | -5.44% |
| Final balance | $64,929 | $69,217 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.99. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, SCHV or VTV?
Over 2010-01-31 to 2026-06-30, VTV performed better: 12.44% annualized versus 12.01% for SCHV, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are SCHV and VTV?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.99 over the common period. SCHV is Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF; VTV is Vanguard Value ETF.
Which is riskier, SCHV or VTV?
Over the common period SCHV had 14.11% annualized volatility and a -25.64% max drawdown, versus 13.95% and -25.07% for VTV.