vs
VB vs VBR: Performance & Backtest Comparison
VB delivered the higher return - 9.85% CAGR vs 9.51% - over 2004-02-29 → 2026-07-31.
Growth comparison
Drawdown
Annual returns
| VB | VBR | |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF |
| CAGR | 9.85% | 9.51% |
| Total return | 728.67% | 672.36% |
| Volatility | 18.90% | 19.08% |
| Max drawdown | -53.70%Feb 2009 | -55.88%Feb 2009 |
| Sharpe | 0.50 | 0.49 |
| Sortino | 0.69 | 0.64 |
| Best year | 37.70% | 36.55% |
| Worst year | -36.18% | -32.20% |
| Final balance | $82,867 | $77,236 |
Correlation of monthly returns: 0.98. Wondering if you need both? Check their fund overlap →
All figures are total returns: every dividend and distribution is reinvested on its ex-date, and prices are split-adjusted. See the methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which has performed better, VB or VBR?
Over 2004-02-29 to 2026-07-31, VB performed better: 9.85% annualized versus 9.51% for VBR, with dividends reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How similar are VB and VBR?
Their monthly returns have a correlation of 0.98 over the common period. VB is Vanguard Small-Cap ETF; VBR is Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF.
Which is riskier, VB or VBR?
Over the common period VB had 18.90% annualized volatility and a -53.70% max drawdown, versus 19.08% and -55.88% for VBR.